changing the “textbook” from chronological to something else: thematic (like “communication”), then use a crowdsourced materials (“why do we look at old things”) to create a customized syllabus. no need to reinvent the wheel. learning outcomes//teaching outcomes (partnership opportunities) what is it to teach thematically? finding the right tools for the job//teaching portal do we focus too much on finding the right tool instead of creating the right content? wiki model//sustainability//editorship resources as a forum/community google+/hangout for a community of peers what value is a community? (teaching outside your area, first time teaching, responding to new groups of students, new teaching methods – expanding the dialogue) how do we keep art history separate from other disciplines? (do we need to?) team teaching/interdisciplinary methodology falling enrollment rates changing the language of classes: syllabi changing, class titles changing k-12/common core changing ideal resource forum: what would it stress? a skill based model (why learn art history) or thematic (art history itself) end of session: creating a google+ community – plus.google.com/u/0/communities/112121309526258693821 see also: plus.google.com/u/0/109713576014955162590/posts links: arthistoryteachingresources.org // omeka.org/.net // narrativemedicine.org //
↧